Scientific and humanistic approaches to evaluation

The humanistic approach in psychology developed as a rebellion against what some psychologists saw as the limitations of the behaviorist and psychodynamic psychology. While the first has yet to be formally defined, the second encompasses a wide range of subcategories and is even an academic discipline of its own.

Observation is used not to count frequencies but to take notes of what is happening in the classroom. Humanism views human beings as fundamentally different from other animals, mainly because humans are conscious beings capable of thought, reason and language.

Consciousness Scientific and humanistic approaches to evaluation emotion are two very subjects to study in a scientific manner McLeod.

This approach to curriculum evaluation focuses on using quantitative data generate by the learners. For example, diary accounts, open-ended questionnairesunstructured interviews and unstructured observations. Humanistic psychology also rejected the psychodynamic approach because it is also deterministic, with unconscious irrational and instinctive forces determining human thought and behavior.

Since qualitative data is processed by the researcher their own perspective can filter what they report when they share the perspective of the respondents, In contrast, scientific approaches are more objective in that computer processes and reports the results.

Conclusion Instead of having a bias towards scientific or humanistic approaches to curriculum evaluation. Rogers and Maslow placed little value on scientific psychologyespecially the use of the psychology laboratory to investigate both human and animal behavior.

This allows for statistical analysis.

What is the Difference Between

The possible reason for the lack of influence on academic psychology can be attributed to the fact that humanistic approaches purposely adopted a non-scientific approach to the study of human behavior and personality McLeod.

In andat the invitation of Abraham Maslow and Clark Moustakas, two meetings were held in Detroit among psychologists who were interested in founding a professional association dedicated to a more meaningful, more humanistic vision.

People are basically good, and have an innate need to make themselves and the world better: For Rogers the focus of psychology is not behavior Skinnerthe unconscious Freudthinking Wundt or the human brain but how individuals perceive and interpret events.

However, comparing humanistic psychology and scientific communication gives us an idea of the difference between humanistic and scientific communication. Its impact can be understood in terms of three major areas: Self-actualization concerns psychological growth, fulfillment and satisfaction in life.

Approaches to Curriculum Evaluation Part I: Scientific vs Humanistic Approach

The criteria of judgement or effectiveness are determined prior to execution of the programme. Curriculum can mean a host of things.

This blog contains papers written by the author on various topics related to psychology. Humanism rejects scientific methodology like experiments and typically uses qualitative research methods.

Qualitative research is useful for studies at the individual level, and to find out, in depth, the ways in which people think or feel e.

The subjective, conscious experiences of the individual is most important: The former is often related to questions of philosophy, existentialism, phenomenology and human emotions, while the latter takes science as its primary focus.

Difference Humanistic communication has yet to be formally defined. This comparison is at the heart of decision-making when this approach is employed.

There are meaning different approaches or ways of seeing curriculum evaluation. Rogers is therefore important because he redirected psychology towards the study of the self.

The Difference Between Humanistic & Scientific Communication

A lickert scale analysis is not as rich in content as an interview. Humanistic evaluators want to understand the complexities of the environment they are assessing. The evaluation does not follow pre-specific design.

The rationale behind this is that life has multiple perspectives to it and quantitative data only provides one perspective. Both behaviorism and psychoanalysis are regarded as dehumanizing by humanistic psychologists. Furthermore, there are questions as to the objectivity of the results.

An example of this would be the belief in free-will, which is in direct contrast to the deterministic laws of science McLeod. The major issues with this approach is the smaller sample size that is required.Approaches to Curriculum Evaluation Part I: Scientific vs Humanistic Approach 3 Replies Curriculum evaluation is the process of collecting data in order to make decisions about the curriculum in question.

Understanding and explaining the difference between humanistic and scientific communication is a challenge. While the first has yet to be formally defined, the second encompasses a wide range of subcategories and is even an academic discipline of.

Dec 10,  · The possible reason for the lack of influence on academic psychology can be attributed to the fact that humanistic approaches purposely adopted a non-scientific approach to the study of human behavior and personality (McLeod).

Scientific And Humanistic Approaches To Evaluation. the Psychodynamic and Humanistic approaches to understanding personality. People engage in topics of personality on a daily basis.

It is how we engage with others, behave. Scientific vs. Humanistic Approach to Evaluation Presented by: Domineik Greathouse Concordia Univeristy The Humanistic Approach consists of. Humanistic Approach: Humanistic approach to evaluation aims at illuminating decision makers about the process of implementation of a project.

The issues and concerns of persons having stake over the project are highlighted and discussed in detail.

Download
Scientific and humanistic approaches to evaluation
Rated 0/5 based on 31 review